There is not a single physicist who was not impressed by Dirac's work. Those who have studied his work know that he had an original and genius-level way of thinking.
Dirac worked on the foundations of quantum mechanics, magnetic monopoles, relativistic quantum mechanics, etc. The latter, relativistic quantum mechanics, is the field in which his contributions probably shine the most. He discovered the Dirac equation, which describes the motion of electrons (or any spin-1/2 fermion). He was also instrumental in discovering the statistics that fermions obey. Through the Dirac equation, Dirac was able to predict the existence of antimatter, such as positrons, which are antielectrons (same mass and spin, opposite charge). This was a huge discovery and came purely from Dirac's theoretical arguments.
Feynman had a more personal reason to be even more impressed (or at least attracted) by Dirac's work. Feynman produced the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics. It is said that he was inspired by a footnote in Dirac's book/monogram on quantum mechanics, in which Dirac mentioned only the essence of this formalism, without any details; it made it seem unimportant. To give you a better idea of the whole story, here is an excerpt from the introduction (written by the masterful Anthony Zee) to the latest edition of Feynman's book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter":
"[...] in 1932, Paul Dirac suggested, in a rather rudimentary form, a third formalism. Dirac's idea seemed to be largely forgotten until 1941, when Feynman developed and elaborated this formalism, which became known as the path integral or history sum formalism. (Physicists sometimes wonder whether Feynman invented this formalism in complete ignorance of Dirac's work. Physics historians have now established that the answer is no. At a party in a Princeton tavern, a visiting physicist named Herbert Jehle told Feynman about Dirac's idea, and apparently the next day Feynman elaborated the formalism in real time in front of the astonished Jehle. Jehle.[...])"
In Dirac's paper "Quantised Singularities in Electromagnetic Fields" he barely uses any mathematics (nothing advanced). He uses basic quantum mechanics and through the simplest of arguments, which goes into great detail, in words, the possibility of the existence of magnetic monopoles emerges.
He did not predict magnetic monopoles, but he proved that they are allowed by quantum mechanics. Furthermore, he found a relationship between magnetic and electric charges. Although his page-long argument could be summarized by some quick formulas of advanced differential geometry (using beams and the like), the fact that he explained it without reference to a technical geometric language shows his depth of thought. I was shocked.
An example that shows what a strange guy Dirac was.
"In 1932, Dirac was appointed Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge University. During a class lecture, a student raised his hand and said, "I don't understand the equation in the top right-hand corner of the blackboard."
Dirac simply nodded and continued undaunted. When asked again, he expressed puzzlement because he thought the student had simply stated a fact and not asked a question."
Finally, it should be said that he did not have a 'superstar physicist' personality, like Einstein and Feynman. He was much quieter, more withdrawn and antisocial. He was an extremely strange guy. For this reason, he is not so popular with the average man, but physicists certainly put him in the upper category of the best physicists ever. Even Feynman.
Image: Photo taken in Jabłonna, near Warsaw, Poland, during the international scientific conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in July 1962.

Comments
Post a Comment