Morally, did Jane Fonda really deserve the criticism that she received as "Hanoi Jane"?
Yes. It’s one thing to disagree with a war, to march and demonstrate against it. That is protected speech and should be cherished, even if one disagrees.
It is a completely different thing to go to the enemy’s capital and pose for photo-ops with the very anti-aircraft guns that were putting our airmen in jeopardy.Quite honestly, she put herself at severe risk of being charged for going there during a war and posing for North Vietnamese propaganda photos — there is a case she could have violated sections 2381 and 2388 of 18 USC 115 — those of treason (given that she provided the NVA free propaganda) and “Activities affecting armed forces during war” (depending on what she said while there and its effects on US operations, including her assertion that POWs were being well-treated). The scorn that veterans of the war have even today for her is well-justified as she was essentially cheering on their deaths, even if that wasn’t her actual intent.
One thing, it is extremely important to state, that she did NOT do was to turn over secret notes from POWs to their North Vietnamese captors. This is a false story, and even with what she did do, she doesn’t deserve to be smeared with false allegations that she intentionally betrayed US servicemen to horrific fates.

Comments
Post a Comment